The following is a simplified summary. Please read the main article:
Hunton: "USCIS Expands “Good Moral Character” Standards for Naturalization" by Sanjee Weliwitigoda
https://www.hunton.com/business-immigration-insights/uscis-expands-good-moral-character-standards-for-naturalization
What changed?
On August 15, 2025, USCIS issued new rules about “good moral
character” for people applying to become U.S. citizens.
Old approach vs. new approach
Before, officers mostly looked to see if you had serious
disqualifying behavior (crimes, fraud, etc.).
Now, they will look at *everything together(“totality of
circumstances”). They will also more strongly consider your positive behaviors.
What positive things will count more now?
Officials will give more weight to:
- Being active in community service or volunteering
- Taking care of family and having strong ties to the U.S.
- Doing well in school or training
- Steady work / career history
- Long lawful residence in the U.S.
- Paying taxes, being financially responsible
What new behaviors might count negatively?
Even if something is not a crime, USCIS may now consider it
negative if it goes against what “average citizens” do. These include:
- Multiple DUI (driving under the influence) convictions
- Unlawful voting
- Repeated traffic violations, harassment, or aggressive
solicitation
- Other conduct inconsistent with civic responsibility
For people with past issues / problems
If someone has past behavior that is questionable, the new
rules ask for **evidence of real rehabilitation**, such as:
- Following court-ordered requirements or probation
- Paying back taxes or child support
- Letters of support or testimony from community members
- Mentoring others who had similar difficulties
What to expect in practice
USCIS will review applications more deeply, not just look
for disqualifying behavior.
- You may need to submit more documents to show your positive
contributions.
- The process may take longer, because USCIS may ask for more
evidence.
- There is higher chance of denial based on more subjective
judgments.
Some concerns / uncertainties
The rules talk about “average behavior” and “civic
responsibility,” which are vague and may lead to inconsistent decisions.
Some people may challenge the rules in court, saying they
violate due process (fairness under law).
